Untitled Document

MEDIATION SERVICES

Similar to the role of the facilitator, the mediator helps the parties design and implement a process by which they can surface, address, and resolve differences successfully. However, while groups of individuals may use facilitators to help them explore alternative solutions and come to joint decisions, mediators help settle disputes that already exist among specific “parties” who have opposing perspectives/positions on how to resolve them.

The mediator has special training to assist conflicting parties come together when communication between them has already broken down and they cannot get resolution by themselves. The mediator is invited by the parties to initiate a step-by-step effort to restore communication, build mutual respect and trust, create a context in which the parties are willing and able to hear one another, generate options, and support them to craft an agreement that resolves past differences and creates the foundation for future cooperation.

Much of IDRS’ work over the past fifteen years has been in Indian country. We have mediated many conflicts within the tribal community—within families, the workplace, the community, and tribal government institutions. Our mediators also have successfully served as intermediaries in a wide variety of “government to government” negotiations between tribes and a myriad of local, county, state and federal agencies. (For a description of our work in “government to government” transactions click on to “gov’t to gov’t”)

How can you arrange for IDRS’ Mediation Services?

You can arrange for mediation services by calling our offices and speaking to one of our mediators on the telephone. The mediator will:

Why Mediation?

IDRS is a strong advocate of the Mediation process because it is quicker and much less expensive than waging battle in the courts today. Moreover, we favor this process because parties are from the beginning to end in the “drivers seat”. Parties enter Mediation voluntarily and can withdraw anytime they think that it is not being productive. Moreover, it is the parties who come up with the ground rules that will guide their deliberations. And, it is the parties who determine what will be included in their Agreement. They ultimately know better than a judge what their interests are and what outcomes are realistic and feasible